<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predicting the future is dabbling with the black arts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thomaslindqvist.com/blogg/featured/predicting-the-future-is-dabbling-with-the-black-arts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thomaslindqvist.com/blogg/featured/predicting-the-future-is-dabbling-with-the-black-arts</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:10:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is your project a failure? &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaslindqvist.com/blogg/featured/predicting-the-future-is-dabbling-with-the-black-arts/comment-page-1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Is your project a failure? &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaslindqvist.com/blogg/?p=291#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] Anyway, all three parameters involved in the project triangle are uncertainties to be delivered in a very change-prone place called the future. So we are asked to bring out the old crystal ball and look into this future. And if this advanced guess-work turns out to be less than accurate, we call our project a failure. Let me rephrase that for the sake of clarity: the failure lies in us not guessing well enough. Isn’t that weird? Sure, there are techniques for estimating, often based on past performance, such as measuring team velocity or average cycle time, but even so that’s past performance (history) and we are headed into the unknown (the future). I have previously made my feeling about his clear. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anyway, all three parameters involved in the project triangle are uncertainties to be delivered in a very change-prone place called the future. So we are asked to bring out the old crystal ball and look into this future. And if this advanced guess-work turns out to be less than accurate, we call our project a failure. Let me rephrase that for the sake of clarity: the failure lies in us not guessing well enough. Isn’t that weird? Sure, there are techniques for estimating, often based on past performance, such as measuring team velocity or average cycle time, but even so that’s past performance (history) and we are headed into the unknown (the future). I have previously made my feeling about his clear. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaslindqvist.com/blogg/featured/predicting-the-future-is-dabbling-with-the-black-arts/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaslindqvist.com/blogg/?p=291#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I did indeed! The scientific study of the history of religions, to be more precise. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did indeed! The scientific study of the history of religions, to be more precise. <img src='http://www.thomaslindqvist.com/blogg/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stinkbugprod</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaslindqvist.com/blogg/featured/predicting-the-future-is-dabbling-with-the-black-arts/comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>stinkbugprod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaslindqvist.com/blogg/?p=291#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Ha ha ha and you studied religion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha and you studied religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
